Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.25 seconds)Section 461 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 462 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 154 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Priyanka Srivastava & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 19 March, 2015
13. It appears that under the scheme of Cr. P. C., it is
provided that how and in what manner, the inquiry is to be ordered
and by analyzing the relevant provisions of Sections 154, 155, 156
and 210, the Hon'ble Apex Court has time and again guided all the
courts that in a routine and mechanical manner, no order could be
passed for sending the matter under Section 156(3) of the Code.
After analyzing the Act at length, the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
decision in case of Priyanka Srivastava Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh,
reported in 2015 (0) AIJEL-SC 56373 in paragraphs 16 to 22, 26, 27
and 32 has observed as under :-
Section 14 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Ramdev Food Products Private Limited vs State Of Gujarat on 16 March, 2015
22. Recently, in Ramdev Food Products Private
Limited v. State of Gujarat[6], while dealing with the
exercise of power under Section 156(3) CrPC by the learned
Magistrate, a three-Judge Bench has held that:
State Of Orissa vs Dhaniram Luhar on 4 February, 2004
In case of
State of Orissa vs. Dhaniram Luhar reported in 2004 (5) SCC
568, the Hon'ble Apex Court has propounded on the issue of
assigning appropriate reasons. The Court would like to quote few
observations contained in paragraphs 7,8,9 and 10 as under :-