Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.66 seconds)Reserve Bank Of India vs Jayantilal N. Mistry on 16 December, 2015
The appellant stated that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a batch
of petitions titled as Reserve Bank of India & Ors. v Jayantilal N. Mistry & Ors dated
16.12.2015 held that:
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
5.8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Central Board of Secondary Education
and another v. Aditya Bandopadhyay and Others, [(2011) 8 SCC 497] has held:
Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Manohar Lal Sharma Advocate vs U.O.I. on 15 July, 2016
In Manohar Lal Sharma v Union of India [(2016) 13 SCC 710], the Supreme
Court declined to entertain a PIL seeking the Court's directions to restrain the union
government from incurring security and other expenses with respect to certain
individuals in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, holding that "nationally sensitive
issues concerning the security of the nation ...should be left to the executive ... and
that these writs are judicially unmanageable." It is relevant to quote the landmark
judgment given by the Constitution Bench in Re: Special Reference No 1 of 2012,
[(2012), 10 SCC 1]:
1