Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.67 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Narender Kumar vs State(N.C.T.Of Delhi) on 25 May, 2012
15. Mr Chaitanya Deshpande, learned Advocate for the appellant
relied on the judgment in Narender Kumar Vs. State (cited supra),
wherein it is observed that :
Tameezuddin @ Tammu vs State Of (Nct) Of Delhi on 26 August, 2009
- Shevantabai who is wife of brother-in-law of the prosecutrix has also
not supported her. According to prosecution, she had shown the spot
to the Police. Obviously, P.W.2-S must have narrated the incident to
her but she has also turned hostile. When all these facts are
considered in totality, those raise a serious doubt about the evidence
of P.W.2-S notwithstanding the consistency in her evidence with the
F.I.R. and absence of any effective cross-examination. In such case,
there is some corroboration required but there is no corroboration of
whatsoever nature. There is no corroboration of medical evidence or
::: Uploaded on - 08/08/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2017 00:52:41 :::
14
Cri.Appeal No.253/2003
other witnesses and not even from her husband. I find that these
facts raise a reasonable doubt. Though the evidence of rape victim
should not be subjected to minute scrutiny, as observed in
Tameeluddin's case, (cited supra), mere statement of rape by raped
victim by itself is not sufficient. Her evidence should be probable,
logical and should inspire confidence in the mind of the Judge. I find
that the evidence of P.W.2-S is not of such a nature.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1