Shakir Husain vs Chandoo Lal And Ors. on 22 July, 1931
In a Full Bench decision of this Court reported in Shakir Hussain v. Chandoo Lal and Ors. A.I.R. (18) 1931 All. 567, Sulaiman Ag. C.J., observed at page 568:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)Kallu Khan vs Abdullah Khan And Anr. on 11 March, 1920
9. The first question has been argued before us at some length. It has been contended on behalf of the appellant that, if the supurdar had misappropriated the property, the remedy of the judgment-debtor was to sue him for recovery of the property or its value and the executing Court had no jurisdiction on an application under Section 145 of the Code to make an order for payment of the value of the property. The learned Counsel for the appellants has relied upon a single Judge ruling of this Court reported in Kallu Khan v. Abdullah Khan A.I.R. (7) 1920 All. 245. In that case the provisions of Section 145 of the Code were not considered at all. Consequently, the decision in that case is of no help in determining the questions raised in these appeals. Section 145, Civil P.C., lays down:
1