Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)
Nimmala Narahari vs C.Narendranath on 21 October, 2021 cites

B. Pushpamma And Ors. vs Joint Collector And Ors. on 18 November, 2004

The three revenue authorities have passed their respective orders after perusing the record and material on record more particularly the proceedings in File No.B/456/89 dated 30.03.1989, as such, there cannot be any basis to hold that the same was not found or untraceable and fabricated. He also submits that the entries in revenue records would only be relevant for the purpose of payment of land revenue and the same would not convey title on the basis of such entries and that the title can only be decided by a competent civil court. As per Section 8(2) of the Act, which specifically contemplates that any person aggrieved as to any rights of which he is in possession by any entry in the record of rights, may institute a suit against any person denying or interested to deny his title to such right for declaration of his right under Chapter VI of the Specific Relief Act. IN support of his contentions, he relied on the judgments reported in (i) 14 B.Pushpamma and others v. Joint Collector [2005 (1) ALD 260] (ii) Surajbhan v. Financial Commissioner [(2007) 6 SCC 186] and (iii) V.Goutham Rao v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2003 (1) ALD 681].
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 15 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

V. Goutham Rao vs Revenue Divisional Officer And Anr. on 31 December, 2002

The three revenue authorities have passed their respective orders after perusing the record and material on record more particularly the proceedings in File No.B/456/89 dated 30.03.1989, as such, there cannot be any basis to hold that the same was not found or untraceable and fabricated. He also submits that the entries in revenue records would only be relevant for the purpose of payment of land revenue and the same would not convey title on the basis of such entries and that the title can only be decided by a competent civil court. As per Section 8(2) of the Act, which specifically contemplates that any person aggrieved as to any rights of which he is in possession by any entry in the record of rights, may institute a suit against any person denying or interested to deny his title to such right for declaration of his right under Chapter VI of the Specific Relief Act. IN support of his contentions, he relied on the judgments reported in (i) 14 B.Pushpamma and others v. Joint Collector [2005 (1) ALD 260] (ii) Surajbhan v. Financial Commissioner [(2007) 6 SCC 186] and (iii) V.Goutham Rao v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2003 (1) ALD 681].
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 8 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1