State Of Bihar vs Murad Ali Khan, Farukh Salauddin & ... on 10 October, 1988
10.1 PW 1 Rohit Verma being the complainant in the present case
deposed that on 29.06.2022, when he was in his house, he received a
call from security guard of the society, that one person was taking
away his blue colour bicycle. Thereafter, he immediately went to main
gate of the society where the security guard Bharat had caught hold of
FIR No. 366/22 PS Madhu Vihar titled as State v. Farukh 5/17
one person alongwith his blue colour bicycle. Thereafter, he made 100
number call and police came and took the accused Farukh whose
name he had come to know later which was disclosed by security
guard Bharat alongwith his bicycle to the PS. Thereafter, he went to
the PS and his statement was recorded Ex. PW1/A. Thereafter, he
alongwith IO came back to the spot and the site plan was prepared at
his instance and accused was arrested in his presence vide arrest
memo Ex. PW1/B. Thereafter, his bicycle was also seized by seizure
memo Ex. PW1/C. The police had also recorded disclosure statement
of accused Ex. PW1/D. Police had also recorded his supplementary
statement. PW 1 in his testimony correctly identified the case property
through photographs and also the accused present in the court.