Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 49 (0.36 seconds)
Klj Resources Limited vs Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 30 July, 2025 cites

Page No.# 1/12 vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd on 30 March, 2021

69. The limitation period started from 13.09.2014 and it stopped on 16.09.2016 at the time when the plaintiff company preferred complaints before the District Forum. The limitation would again start w.e.f. 8.3.2022 i.e. one day after the day when the complaints were returned by the District Consumer Forum. The present suit has been filed on 12.5.2023 i.e after One year two months and five days. The total period spent by the plaintiff company, excluding the period spent before District Forum, would be Two years and four days + One year two months and five days i.e Three years two Months and nine Days. The KLJ Resources Ltd Date of Judgment 30.07.2025 (Page 37 of 74 ) Vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd ( 796/2023) plaintiff company can be given the benefit under section 14 of the Limitation Act,1963 only for that period which was spent before the District Forums.
Gauhati High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - K R Surana - Full Document

Thomas vs Manager, Bishop Moore College on 10 March, 1987

Of course, their Lordships were speaking in the context of Section 99 of the Code. Their Lordships referred to the above quoted observation of the Court of Appeal in Thomas v. Moore [(1918) 1 KB 555 : 87 LKB 577 (CA)] in that decision. It is therefore clear that a suit that may be bad for misjoinder of causes of action is not one that could be got struck out or rejected by a defendant as a matter of right and the discretion vests with the court either to proceed with the suit or to direct the plaintiff to take steps to rectify the defect.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next