Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.44 seconds)The Punjab Rent Act, 1995
Devinder Singh Qaumi vs Kulwant Singh Nijjar And Anr on 4 March, 2016
Further, this Court has carefully read the judgment in
Devinder Singh Qaumi's case (supra). The Court was examining
correctness of an order passed by the Rent Controller on 11.12.2015
declining to implead petitioner as party respondent in the eviction
petition. In the aforesaid case, the petitioner before this Court had taken
a plea that he alongwith his deceased brother had jointly taken the house
on rent. The proceedings were pending before the Rent Controller. The
learned Court in the facts of the case permitted the petitioner to be
impleaded as party while directing the Rent Controller to conclude the
trial within a period of 6 months. With highest respect, the aforesaid
judgment does not as a ratio decidendi lays down that the application for
being impleadment in the eviction proceedings by any one should be
allowed.
Jaimal Singh vs Ashok Kumar on 4 August, 2016
Next judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the
petitioner is in the case of Jaimal Singh's (supra). In this case, the
3 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 07-06-2020 01:06:03 :::
CR-1479-2020(O&M) 4
allegations were that the tenant has sublet the rented premises to Ram
Kumar. An application was filed to implead Ram Kumar as party-
respondent which was dismissed. On reading of the order it appears that
the landlord had filed the application for impleadment. The aforesaid
application was dismissed by the Rent Controller. This Court allowed
the revision petition. In the considered view of this Court, aforesaid
judgment also does not help the petitioner.
1