Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.77 seconds)Article 22 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Section 108 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Shibapada Mukherjee vs The State Of West Bengal on 25 January, 1972
Our aforesaid conclusion is
supported by the decision of this Court in Shibapada
Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal 1974 (3) SCC 50
wherein the Court observed that there being no valid
confirmation and continuation, the result is that the
petitioners detention after expiry of the period of three
months becomes illegal since it was not in compliance with
Section 12 (i). It would be appropriate, at this stage, to
extract the following few lines from the aforesaid judgment:
Binod Singh vs District Magistrate Dhanbad Bihar & ... on 26 September, 1986
In support of the third contention, Mr.
Kotwal relies upon the decision of this Court in Binod Singh
V. District Magistrate, Dhanbad, Bihar and Others 1986 (4)
SCC 416. In the aforesaid case, this Court has observed:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sandeep Atmaram Parwal vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 31 August, 1996
In support of this contention, Mr. Kotwal, learned
senior counsel relies upon the decision of the Full Bench of
the Bombay High Court in the case of Sandeep Atmaram Parwal
V. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Writ Petition No.
379 of 1995, disposed of on 31.8.96, since reported in 1996
II LJ 1 as well the decision of Full Bench of the Delhi High
Court in the case of Akhilesh Kumar Tyagi V. Union of India
and Others 1996 Crl.L.J.965.