Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (1.02 seconds)The General Clauses Act, 1897
Section 3 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Budha Veerinaidu vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Anr. on 17 August, 1977
In Budha Veerinaidu vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary
Food and Agricultural Department, Hyderabad and another, the extension of the
jurisdiction to the earlier Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal the service
grievances of employees of Market Committee also came up before the Division
Bench. The Division Bench held that "it is clear that if the management and control
of the local fund is entrusted by the Government to a particular body or authority, that
body or authority would become local authority within the meaning of clause 31 of
Section 3 of the General clauses Act, 1897.
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
18. As held by the Supreme Court in L.Chandra Kumar Vs Union of India, the
Administrative Tribunal is the Court of first instance and an aggrieved employee on
his service grievance has to invoke the jurisdiction of the Tribunal before coming to
this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The decision of the Division
Bench relied on by the learned Standing Counsel binds the issue in these writ
petitions and in view of the said decision the petitioners have to avail the remedy as
provided under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to seek to redress their
service disputes. The Writ Petitions are liable to be dismissed and are accordingly
dismissed, leaving it open to petitioners to avail the remedies available under the
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.