Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.30 seconds)
National Highways Authority Of India vs Sri.K.V.Radhakrishna on 7 February, 2020 cites

M/S Dyna Technologies Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Crompton Greaves Ltd. on 18 December, 2019

In a decision referred above, ILR 1997 KAR 3419, the land acquired is not abutting the National Highway, but it is a separate agricultural property. The 22 A.S.No.58/2018 decision referred above reported in AIR 2003 SC 2629 deals with the award could be set-aside if it went against the Public Policy of India. It was held that "the word Public Policy of India used in Section 34 in context is required to be given a wider meaning if the award on the face of it patently in violation of the statutory provisions cannot be said to be in public interest. Such award is likely to adversely affect in the administration of justice."
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 268 - N V Ramana - Full Document

Mohammad Yusuf And Ors. Etc. Etc. vs The State Of Haryana And Ors on 16 April, 2018

31. No doubt, both the above 2 decisions are arising out of disputes arising out of the land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. However, the principle laid down in the above decisions are on determination of just compensation to the land loosers due to acquisition of their land. Therefore, the ratio laid down in the above 2 decisions are also applicable to the present case and it cannot be construed that the same is not applicable merely because, the instant case is 26 A.S.No.58/2018 arising out of land acquisition under the National Highway Authorities Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 17 - R K Agrawal - Full Document
1   2 3 Next