Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.52 seconds)R.Kandasamy vs The District Collector on 25 September, 2013
Section 109 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
M.Vettaivillan vs The District Collector on 12 August, 2009
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit
that despite the lapse of two years there has been no progress in the
case and that the petitioner had applied to the District Collector seeking
for appointment of a Special Public Prosecutor to conduct the case on
his behalf as per Rule 4(5) of
http://www.judis.nic.in the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
3
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. He would
further submit that the petitioner has also intended to engage one
Mr.G.Bhagavath Singh, practicing Advocate of Madurai District as
Special Public Prosecutor and that the said Advocate has also expressed
his willingness to conduct prosecution accepting the fees as per the
schedule. Despite the petitioner having sent the representation on
04.01.2018, the first respondent has not considered the same till date.
Due to the non appointment of the Special Public Prosecutor there is a
chance that the trial could be further delayed causing hardship to the
petitioner. He would also submit that in similar circumstances this
court in earlier decisions directed appointment of Special Public
Prosecutors to conduct the case. He would rely on the judgments of this
Court reported in 2009 (2) MWN (Cr.) 436 (M,Vettaivilian Vs. The
District Collector, Sivagangai District and others) and 2013 (4)
MLJ (Crl.)
1