Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.22 seconds)Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 307 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
As per guideline No.7 of guidelines formulated by the Apex
Court in "State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal" (referred supra) where
a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or
where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior
motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to
spite him due to private and personal grudge, this Court can
exercise power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and quash the
proceedings.
Kurukshetra University And Anr. vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 22 March, 1977
In view of the law declared by the Apex Court in "State of
Orissa v. Saroj Kumar Sahoo" and "Kurukshetra University v.
State Of Haryana" (referred supra) when the investigation is at
fetus stage, this Court cannot interfere with the process of
investigation and quash the proceedings by exercising power under
Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and the petition is liable to be dismissed.
State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo on 7 December, 2005
In view of the law declared by the Apex Court in "State of
Orissa v. Saroj Kumar Sahoo" and "Kurukshetra University v.
State Of Haryana" (referred supra) when the investigation is at
fetus stage, this Court cannot interfere with the process of
investigation and quash the proceedings by exercising power under
Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and the petition is liable to be dismissed.
The State Of A.P., Rep. By Its Public ... vs Bhuma Venkata Nagi Reddy And Eleven ... on 10 February, 2014
Sri B.P.Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, mainly
contended that when there is abnormal delay both in lodging
complaint and forwarding same to the jurisdictional Magistrate,
the said delay creates serious doubt about the case of the
prosecution. He placed reliance on the judgments of High Court of
Judicature at Hyderabad viz. "State of Andhra Pradesh v.
Bhuma Venkata Nagi Reddy1", "Nakka Sreenivasa Rao @
Sreenu v. State of Andhra Pradesh2", "A.Janga Reddy v. Indira
Reddy3" and the judgment of the Apex Court in "D.Thamodaran
v. Kandasamy4" to contend that the allegations made in the
complaint do not constitute offences punishable under Sections
307, 147, 148 read with 149 of I.P.C., requested to quash the
proceedings at this stage.