Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)
Smt. Gyarsi Devi vs Sain Das And Ors. on 30 June, 1981 cites

Kilari Mammi And Ors. vs Barium Chemicals Ltd. And Ors. on 3 October, 1978

In Kilari Mammi v. Barium Chemicals Ltd. 1979 ACJ 58: (AIR 1979 Andh Pra 75), the driver of a jeep parked the jeep and went to a shop but he left the ignition key in the jeep. Another person who was also an employee of the defendant company, which owned the jeep, started the jeep and drove it into a shop causing damage to the articles in the shop and causing injuries to some persons in the shop. It was held that the driver had acted negligently in leaving the ignition key in the ieep and that it was the real and effective cause of the accident and that the master was liable for negligence of its servant, viz., the driver of the jeep.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 7 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Lachman Singh And Ors. vs Gurmit Kaur And Ors. on 1 January, 1800

I find that the Claims Tribunal has not recorded any finding with regard to second head of the claim based on nervous shock, pain and mental agony suffered by her. The law to, however, well settled that in the event of a fatal accident, compensation can be claimed by the relatives of the deceased for the loss of their dependency under Section 1A of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 and the legal heirs of the deceased can claim compensation for the loss caused to the estate of the deceased under Section 2 of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855. The dependents are not entitled to any compensation for sentimental damage, harassment or pain and suffering. (See Davies v. Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd., 1942 AC 601. per Lord Wright; Lachman Singh v. Gurmit Singh.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 77 - Full Document

Ganga Sugar Corporation Ltd. And Ors. vs Sukhbir Singh And Anr. on 29 August, 1973

In Ganga Sugar Corporation Ltd. v. Sukhbir Singh, 1973 ACJ 449: (AIR 1974 All 113) the driver of a jeep, finding that his way was blocked by a Barat Party, left the jeep on the road and went to the Police Station. The ignition key was left in the jeep and someone drove the jeep and caused an accident. It was held that the driver was guilty of negligence in leaving the keys in the jeep and that he should have reasonably anticipated that someone would get into the jeep and try to drive it and therefore, the master was held liable to pay the compensation.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1