Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.38 seconds)
Arvind Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And 4 Others on 26 November, 2020 cites

Rishikesh Lal Srivastava vs State Of U.P. & Others on 10 December, 2012

"47. Thereafter, the Court came to the conclusion that in view of the aforesaid amendments as noted above and the addition of the two clauses in Regulation 31, the Principal or Headmaster of the Institution became competent to terminate the services of a Class-IV employee with further provision of an appeal and a representation to the Inspector of Schools thereafter. The Division Bench carefully examined the impact of the said amendments and came to the conclusion that the purpose of including the two clauses as brought by way of amendments in 1975 and 1978, clearly establish that the Principal is empowered to terminate the services of a Class-IV employee without taking prior approval of the Inspector. Such a decision by the Principal or Headmaster was to be final, subject to an appeal before the Committee of Management and then a further appeal to the Inspector. The relevant paragraphs of the said judgment namely paragraphs 24 to 26 are quoted below:
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 4 - P K Baghel - Full Document
1