Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.24 seconds)Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003
9. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are
required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent
abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash
non-compoundable offenses after considering the nature of the
offense and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties.
Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases
arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the
parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed
upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas
Rao v. D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and
Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC
OnLine Del 8179.
K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa on 22 February, 2013
9. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are
required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent
abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash
non-compoundable offenses after considering the nature of the
offense and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties.
Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases
arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the
parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed
upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas
Rao v. D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and
Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC
OnLine Del 8179.
Sh. Yashpal Chaudhrani & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr. on 22 April, 2019
9. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are
required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent
abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash
non-compoundable offenses after considering the nature of the
offense and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties.
Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases
arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the
parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed
upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas
Rao v. D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and
Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC
OnLine Del 8179.
1