Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.23 seconds)Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 287 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Emperor vs Shivdas Omkar Marwadi on 15 November, 1912
death was the result of a rash or negligent act or
that any such act was the proximate and
efficient cause of the death. If that were so, the
acquittal of the appellant for contravention of the
provisions of the Act and the Rules would itself
of
have been an answer and we would have then
examined to what extent additional evidence of
rt
his acquittal would have to be allowed, but since
that is not the criteria, we have to determine
whether the appellant's act in giving only one
batch number to all the four lots manufactured
on 12-11-62 in preparing batch No. 211105 was
the cause of deaths and whether those deaths
were a direct consequence of the appellants' act,
that is, whether the appellant's act is the direct
result of a rash and negligent act and that act
was the proximate and efficient cause without
the intervention of another's negligence. As
observed by Sir Lawrence Jenkins in Emperor v.
Omkar Rampratap (1902) 4 Bom LR 679 the act
causing the deaths "must be the cause causans;
It is not enough that it may have been the causa
sine qua non". This view has been adopted by
this Court in several decisions.
Suleman Rehiman Mulani & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 1 December, 1967
A subsequent
decision of this Court in Suleman Rahiman
Mulani v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC 829
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:42:28 :::HCHP
12
has once again approved the view taken in
Omkar Rampratap's case (supra) that the act of
.
Arnold Rodricks & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 March, 1966
of
To the same effect are the decisions of this
Court in Rustom Sherior Irani v. State of
Maharashtra 1969 ACJ 70; Balchandra @ Bapu
rt
and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC
1319; Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana (1970)
3 SCC 904; S.N Hussain v. State of A.P. (1972)
3 SCC 18; Ambalal D. Bhatt v. State of Gujarat
(1972) 3 SCC 525 and Jacob Mathew's case".
S. Mehar Chand Krishan Kumar vs The State Of Haryana on 26 November, 1970
of
To the same effect are the decisions of this
Court in Rustom Sherior Irani v. State of
Maharashtra 1969 ACJ 70; Balchandra @ Bapu
rt
and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC
1319; Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana (1970)
3 SCC 904; S.N Hussain v. State of A.P. (1972)
3 SCC 18; Ambalal D. Bhatt v. State of Gujarat
(1972) 3 SCC 525 and Jacob Mathew's case".
S.N. Hussain vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 January, 1972
of
To the same effect are the decisions of this
Court in Rustom Sherior Irani v. State of
Maharashtra 1969 ACJ 70; Balchandra @ Bapu
rt
and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC
1319; Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana (1970)
3 SCC 904; S.N Hussain v. State of A.P. (1972)
3 SCC 18; Ambalal D. Bhatt v. State of Gujarat
(1972) 3 SCC 525 and Jacob Mathew's case".
Ambalal D. Bhatt vs The State Of Gujarat on 7 March, 1972
of
To the same effect are the decisions of this
Court in Rustom Sherior Irani v. State of
Maharashtra 1969 ACJ 70; Balchandra @ Bapu
rt
and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC
1319; Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana (1970)
3 SCC 904; S.N Hussain v. State of A.P. (1972)
3 SCC 18; Ambalal D. Bhatt v. State of Gujarat
(1972) 3 SCC 525 and Jacob Mathew's case".