Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.22 seconds)

Gorle Appalana Nagarjuna Rao And Others vs Government Of A.P. And Others on 13 October, 2000

One of the major contentions raised by the learned senior counsel for the respondents before this Court is that the petitioner allegedly purchased the property under the registered document, which is part and parcel of Inam village as determined by the Inam Deputy Tahsildar and the said finding of Inam Deputy Tahsildar is subject to appeal pending before the Revenue Divisional Officer. When once a particular land is declared as Inam, such land cannot be alienated. He placed reliance on the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in "Gorle Appalana Nagarjuna v. Government of Andhra Pradesh" (referred supra), wherein the Court held that Under Section 3(1) of the Act, the Tahsildar may suo motu or on an application enquire and determine:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

C.Radhakrishnama Naidu And Others vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. ... on 1 June, 2015

and "C.Radhakrishnamma Naidu v. Government of A.P. and others4", where the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad held that "In the absence of a notification being issued by the State Government, in exercise of its powers under Section 22A(1)(e) of the 2 2011 (6) ALD 502 3 2012 (2) ALT 647 4 2015(4) ALT 1 MSM,J wps_20541_2019 and 133_2020 15 Registration Act, the question whether the State Government has an avowed or accrued interest does not necessitate examination".
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 68 - Cited by 3 - S V Bhatt - Full Document
1   2 Next