Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)

Santosh Gupta vs State Bank Of Patiala on 29 April, 1980

In the case of Santosh Gupta Vs. State Bank of Patiala 1980 SCC p. 340 while considering the provisions of Section 2(oo), 25F, 25FF and 25FFF of the Act the Supreme Court held that "retrenchment" includes all kinds of termination of service by employer for any reason whatsoever except those not expressly included in Section 25FF and 25FFF. The discharge of workman on the ground of his/her failure to pass confirmation test amounted to retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 155 - O C Reddy - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs Shri N. Sundara Money on 16 January, 1976

5. On behalf of the petitioner, reliance is placed on the decision in the case of State Bank of India Vs. N. Sundra money reported in (1976) 1 L.L.J. p. 478 wherein it is held by the Supreme Court that "it is the substance and not the form of the termination order, which would be decisive whether the termination is outside the species of the retrenchment "for any reason whatsoever" making the retrenchment compensation payable to the worker."
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 323 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1