Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Shri Genu Laxman Shinde & Ohters vs Shri Chandrakant Dagadu Kotulkar on 14 October, 1998
22. Mr. Arjunwadkar also placed reliance on the decisions of this
.Vishal Parekar ...16
::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:57:48 :::
wp-9457-2018.doc
Court in the cases of Anoopchand Nathmal Baid vs. Maharashtra
Revenue Tribunal at Nagpur and Others2 and Genu Laxman Shinde
vs. Chandrakant Dagadu Kotulkar 3, to bolster up the case that in
the case at hand, there was no error apparent on the face of the
record.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Seeds Act, 1966
Section 43 in The Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948
Anoopchand Nathmal Baid vs Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal And Ors. on 30 January, 1986
22. Mr. Arjunwadkar also placed reliance on the decisions of this
.Vishal Parekar ...16
::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:57:48 :::
wp-9457-2018.doc
Court in the cases of Anoopchand Nathmal Baid vs. Maharashtra
Revenue Tribunal at Nagpur and Others2 and Genu Laxman Shinde
vs. Chandrakant Dagadu Kotulkar 3, to bolster up the case that in
the case at hand, there was no error apparent on the face of the
record.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Balkrishna Tukaram Shikhare vs Madhukar Ramchandra Pawar on 5 October, 1979
20. To lend support to this submission, Mr. Arjunwadkar placed
reliance on a Division Bench judgment in the case of Balkrishna
Tukaram Shikhare vs. Madhukar Ramchandra Pawar 1 wherein the
limited discretionary nature of review jurisdiction was enunciated.
1