Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.26 seconds)
L.S.Asokan vs State on 3 August, 2005 cites

Joseph Kurian vs State Of Kerala on 4 October, 1994

The@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA later Division Bench also held that the decisions of the Single Judge in In re. Chief Judl.Magistrate, Trivandrum@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA and that of the Division Bench in Kurian V. State were@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA per incuriam and directed the Chief Judl.Magistrate ,@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Trivandrum (who had committed some of the cases to the@@ AAAAAAAAAA Sessions Court without examining the approver) to examine the approver giving an opportunity to the accused to cross-examine the approver and then to deal with the matter in accordance with law. It was pursuant to the above direction that the approver was examined by the Chief Judl.Magistrate and some of the appellants had cross-examined the approver also.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 67 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

State Of Kerala And Etc. vs Monu D. Surendran And Anr. Etc. on 30 November, 1989

There is no@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA dispute that those appellants/accused who had cross-examined the approver during his examination under Section 306(4)(a) Cr.P.C. was pursuant to the direction given to the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Monu@@ AAAA Surendran's case wherein it was the State which sought@@ AAAAAAAAAAA for the direction to examine the approver giving opportunity to the accused to cross-examine him. Thus, cross-examination was virtually thrust upon the appellants/accused without their asking for it. In such situation, the cross-examination conducted by them cannot be said to be as of right.
Kerala High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Surinder Mohan And Others on 7 February, 2000

It is pertinent to note that in paragraph 12 of the above decision the apex court has adverted to the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court reported in In.@@ AAA re: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trivandrum - 1988@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Crl.L.J. 812 and what is important to observe is that@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAA the apex court has not disapproved the said decision which was held to be one rendered per incuriam by the Division Bench of this Court in Monu Surendran.@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 41 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next