Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.37 seconds)
Saurabh Malhotra S/O Suraj Malhotra vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 January, 2023 cites

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute. In this category of cases, the High Court may quash the criminal proceedings if in its view, because of the compromise between the offender and the victim, the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and continuation of the criminal case would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice and extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite full and (Downloaded on 12/01/2023 at 11:23:43 PM) (5 of 11) [CRLMP-9687/2022] complete settlement and compromise with the victim. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceeding or continuation of the criminal proceeding would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that the criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceeding." (emphasis added) (11) After relying on Gian Singh (supra), the Supreme Court in Narinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, has observed as under :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1   2 Next