Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)Datar Switchgears Ltd vs Tata Finance Ltd. & Anr on 18 October, 2000
Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the
respondent has failed to appoint an Arbitrator even after the notice was
served upon the respondent. Therefore, after the filing of the present
Arbitration Case 141 of 2008 [ 3]
petition, the offer of the respondent nominating Shri V.B. Handa to be
its Arbitrator is not fair and that this Court should appoint an
independent Arbitrator rather than constituting Arbitral Tribunal in
terms of the arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties.
Reference is made to Datar Switchgear Ltd. v. Tata Finance Ltd.,
(2000) 8 SCC 151 and Punj Lloyd Ltd. v.Petronet MHB Ltd., (2006)2
SCC 638.
Northn. Rly. Admn., Min.Of Railway, N.D vs Patel Engineering Company Ltd on 18 August, 2008
The issue raised has been examined by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Northern Railway Admn., Ministry of Railway v.
Patel Engineering Co. Ltd., (2008) 10 SCC 240, wherein the
contingencies contemplated in sub-section (6) of Section 11 of the Act,
have been delineated as under:-
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
1