Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.25 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka (Deceased) ... vs Jasjit Singh And Ors on 18 March, 1993
In case title Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka v. Jasjit Singh and Ors.
(1993) 2 SCC 507, Hon'ble Apex Court ruled that:
Sunder Dass vs Ram Prakash on 24 February, 1977
In case title Sunder Dass Vs. Ram Prakash1 of Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.
N. Bhagwati while speaking in for the Bench ruled,
"The validity of a decree can be challenged in execution proceedings only
on the ground that the court which passed the decree lacked inherent
jurisdiction. A court is said to be lacking in jurisdiction when it could not
have seisin of the case because the subject matter was wholly foreign to
its jurisdiction or that the defendant was dead at the time of institution of
the suit or when the suit was decreed. Inherent lack of jurisdiction means a
power or jurisdiction which does not at all exist or vest in a court. A court
lacks inherent jurisdiction when the subject matter is wholly foreign to its
ambit and is totally unconnected with its recognized jurisdiction."
Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur vs Gokul Narain & Anr on 10 April, 1996
In Case title Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur Vs. Gokul Narain 3,
Hon'ble Supreme Court held that,