Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.93 seconds)
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma vs Mr. Sushil Chander Sharma & Ors. on 3 January, 2024 cites

Shakuntala Devi vs Ashok Kumar Bajaj on 2 February, 1996

11. Controverting the aforesaid submissions, Mr. Subhash Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present petition is an abuse of process of law as the civil suit titled "Shakuntla Devi vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma" is pending since the year 2008 before the learned Trial Court and final arguments on behalf of the respondents have been concluded and the petitioner is in the process of addressing his final submissions. Further, this is the fourth application moved on behalf of the petitioner to summon the two witnesses to prove the salary record of deceased Mr. Rajinder Pal Singh and an official witness to prove the court record of the another case.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Sharma vs Sushil Chander Sharma & Ors on 8 November, 2021

1979-80/2023 titled "Ashok Kumar Sharma vs. Sushil Chander Sharma and Ors.". This Court vide order dated 17.01.2023, permitted the petitioner to summon both the aforesaid witnesses with direction to examine the witnesses for one particular day and unless there are extenuating circumstances, due to which the witnesses are unable to appear, suitable time as per the convenience of the learned Trial Court may be given. The petition was disposed of subject to cost of Rs. 20,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent within a week.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Smt. Shakuntala Devi vs State Of Chhattisgarh 116 Wpc/114/2019 ... on 15 January, 2019

with record and summoning of the record through witness of Civil Suit titled "Shakuntla Devi vs. Vimla Devi & Ors." C.S. No. 13224/2016, pending in the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Central) (hereinafter referred to as "ADJ"). In this regard, he was permitted to summon the aforesaid witnesses by this Court vide order dated 08.11.2016 in CRP No. 272/2019 with the direction that the witnesses be examined on one day. Due to various reasons assigned on behalf of the petitioner, the witnesses could not Signature Not Verified CM(M) 515/2023 Page 1 of 6 Digitally Signed By:NEELAM Signing Date:10.01.2024 10:30:55 be examined and he had moved an application under Order XVI Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC, which was dismissed by the learned ADJ vide order dated 23.11.2022. The petitioner challenged the said order by moving CM(M) 62/2023 and CM APPLS.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1