Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.38 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 105 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sadashiv Ramrao Hadbe vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. on 17 January, 2006
In the case of Sadashiv Ramrao Hadbe Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Another (2007) 1 Supreme
Court Cases (Cri) 161, it was held that it is true that in a
rape case the accused could be convinced on the sole
testimony of the prosecutrix, if it is capable of inspiring
confidence in the mind of the court. If the version given by
STATE VS RAJ SINGH DALAL //FIR NO.1042/04
PSSULTAN PURI //U/S. 342 376 506 IPC.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Tameezuddin @ Tammu vs State Of (Nct) Of Delhi on 26 August, 2009
In the case of Tameezudin @ Tammu Vs. State
of (NCT) of Delhi 2009 (4) JCC 2809 it was held that it is
true that in the case of rape the evidence of the prosecutrix
must be given predominant consideration, but to hold that
this evidence has to be accepted even if the story is
improbable and belies logic, would be doing violence to the
very principles which govern the appreciation of evidence in
a criminal manner.