Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008
In support of my opinion I relied on
the decision reported in AIR 2008 SC 2033 in case of
Anathula Sudhakar Vs. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by LRs and
Others.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)Naganna vs Shivanna on 8 January, 2004
In support of my opinion I relied on the decision reported in
ILR 2004 KAR.1074 in case of Naganna Vs. Shivanna. The
lordship have held at Head note B. thus:
Gurunath Manohar Pavaskar & Ors vs Nagesh Siddappa Navalgund & Ors on 11 December, 2007
12. On perusal of the oral and documentary evidence it is
clearly established that Plaintiff has proved her possession of the
suit property at the time of the filing of the suit and Plaintiff has
proved the interference of the Defendants in peaceful possession
and enjoyment of the suit property of the Plaintiff. With these
reasons and relying on the decision referred above, I hold that the
Plaintiff is entitle for the relief sought in the Plaint. Hence, I
answer this point in the Affirmative.
Section 3 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 110 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
1