Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 38 in Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Charity Commissioner vs Padmavati And Ors. on 15 April, 1955
329; M. L. and B. Corporation Ltd. v. Bhutnath, ; Charity Commissioner v. Padmavati, and Imperial Tobacco Co. of India Ltd. v. Asst. Labour Commr., Patna, .
Section 12 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 5 in The Punjab Tenancy Rules [Entire Act]
Ram Raj Tobacco Trading Co., By Its ... vs Asst. Commercial Tax Officer, Attur And ... on 16 November, 1956
329; M. L. and B. Corporation Ltd. v. Bhutnath, ; Charity Commissioner v. Padmavati, and Imperial Tobacco Co. of India Ltd. v. Asst. Labour Commr., Patna, .
Salubai Ramchandra And Ors. vs Chandu Saju And Ors. on 24 March, 1965
22. The order under challenge before the Tribunal, namely, the appellate order of the Deputy Collector, rejects the application of the petitioner on the short ground that he claimed the property as a result of family partition in 1959. The Deputy Collector could not have rejected the application of the petitioner on this ground in view ol the decision of this Court in Smt. Salubai v. Chandu, . In view of this decision it is necessary not only to set aside the order of the Tribunal but also the order of the Deputy Collector which is ex facie not correct, and remand the matter to the Deputy Collector for a fresh decision of the appeal according to law. The orders of the Tribunal and the Deputy Collector are therefore set aside and the matter is remanded to the ap-pellate authority for being considered at the appellate stage.