Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.28 seconds)Gopalakrishna Trading Co. vs D. Baskaran on 20 April, 1992
7. Regarding the second submission, in Crl. O. P. No. 8731 of 1992 and other cases in which Justice T. S. Arunachalam had rendered judgment, the learned judge had referred to Gopalakrishna Trading Co. v. D. Baskran [1994] 80 Comp Cas 53, in which Justice Janarthanam had held that a manager or any other person authorised by the company can represent it during the course of legal proceedings before the court and file a complaint. Justice Janarthanam had observed as follows (at page 56) :
Anil Kumar Sawhney vs Gulshan Rai on 11 October, 1993
In Anil Kumar Sawhney v. Gulshan Rai [1994] 79 Comp Cas 150 (SC), the apex court had held that only the dates which the cheques bear are the relevant dates, as only on those dates they would assume the character of "cheque". The apex court had clearly laid down the law as follows (at page 157) :
Section 204 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1