Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.78 seconds)
Syed Rasheed vs The State Of Telangana on 12 November, 2025 cites

Shaik Mahaboob Basha vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 14 August, 1997

7. It is pertinent to note that Standing Order No. 601-A enumerates the specific circumstances under which a rowdy sheet may be opened against an individual. A close reading of the Standing Order indicates that mere involvement in multiple crimes 4 is not, by itself, sufficient. The foundational requirement is that the individual must be involved in activities that adversely affect public peace, tranquility, or the security of the community. Judicial pronouncements of this Court, including Puttagunta Pulla Rao v. State of A.P., 2004 (2) ALD 36, and Shaik Mahaboob Basha v. State of A.P., 2015 SCC OnLine Hyd 166, consistently emphasize that rowdy-sheeting is a serious invasion of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, and therefore must be resorted to strictly in accordance with the Standing Orders. Courts have repeatedly held that indiscriminate opening of rowdy sheets without assessment of threat to public order is unconstitutional and liable to be quashed.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Puttagunta Venkata Mohana Rao, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 9 July, 2018

7. It is pertinent to note that Standing Order No. 601-A enumerates the specific circumstances under which a rowdy sheet may be opened against an individual. A close reading of the Standing Order indicates that mere involvement in multiple crimes 4 is not, by itself, sufficient. The foundational requirement is that the individual must be involved in activities that adversely affect public peace, tranquility, or the security of the community. Judicial pronouncements of this Court, including Puttagunta Pulla Rao v. State of A.P., 2004 (2) ALD 36, and Shaik Mahaboob Basha v. State of A.P., 2015 SCC OnLine Hyd 166, consistently emphasize that rowdy-sheeting is a serious invasion of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, and therefore must be resorted to strictly in accordance with the Standing Orders. Courts have repeatedly held that indiscriminate opening of rowdy sheets without assessment of threat to public order is unconstitutional and liable to be quashed.
Telangana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1