Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)

The State Of Punjab And Others vs Balbir Singh And Others on 14 August, 2012

Such discriminatory treatment meted out by an employer with regard to the regularisation of employees has been dealt with in extenso by a Division Bench of this Court in State of Punjab and others vs. Balbir Singh and others in LPA No.706 of 2020 decided on 29.03.2022, wherein, speaking through Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, the following was held:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 13 - R N Raina - Full Document

Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977

11. Further still, the orders dated 22.10.2020(Annexure P-31 in CWP- 20151-2021) and 16.02.2021 (Annexure P-33 in CWP-20151-2021), whereby the benefit of regularisation were withdrawn from the petitioners, were passed by the Managing Director, without the approval of the Board of Directors, which make them unsustainable in the eyes of law. Moreover, a perusal of the said orders 22.10.2020(Annexure P-31 in CWP-20151-2021) and 16.02.2021 (Annexure P-33 in CWP-20151-2021) does not indicate that the regularisation was withdrawn for the reason of non-availability of the sanctioned posts or for the lack of financial approval from the State Government. The respondent- Corporation cannot be allowed to present new reasons to justify its decisions, as has been attempted in the written statements, subsequent to passing of the said orders. Reliance in this regard can be placed on the judgment rendered by a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh Gill and another vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and others, 9 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 19-02-2026 23:03:56 ::: LPA-3586-2025 and other connected cases 10 (1978) 1 SCC 405, wherein speaking through Justice Krishna Iyer, the following was opined:
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 4221 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1