Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)Ashok Leland Ltd vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr on 7 January, 2004
In Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. this Court held:
S.N. Chandrashekar And Anr vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 2 February, 2006
Liable, subordinate, subservient, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by; provided that; provided, answerable for. Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp. 345 Mo. 650, 136 S.W. 2d 289, 302
[See also S.N. Chandrashekar and Anr. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. ]
Section 32 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
The Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Grasim Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 5 November, 1997
Applicability of Grasim Industries Ltd. (supra) vis-`-vis Rule 57Q(3) of the Rules has now become irrelevant. Clause (c) of Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 57AC of the Rules deals with a situation with which we are concerned. By reason of the said provision, the credit sought to be given by reason of Rule 57Q(3) has not been taken away in its entirety, but merely postulates that if the credit had Page 2485 not already been availed, the same merely be obtained but limited only to the extent of 50% thereof.
The Central Excise Act, 1944
1