Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.57 seconds)

M/S. Pepsi Foods Ltd. & Anr vs Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors on 4 November, 1997

9. From the above said discussion, it emerge that guideline no. 21 on RTI Act, 2005 provides that any application not accompanied by the prescribed fees of rs. 10/- or proof of the applicant belonging to below poverty line shall not be valid application under the Act. Guideline no. 2 regarding applications received without fees provides that soon after receiving application, the public information officer should check whether the applicant has made the payment of application fees or whether the applicant is a person belonging to below poverty line family. The accused has not committed any illegality when he issued the letter/Ex.C4 to the complainant, asking the complainant to deposit the required amount either through the Indian postal order or bank draft, mentioning that the number of IPO had been mentioned but the original IPO of rs. 10/- was not attached with the application. It was held by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M/s. Pepsi Food Ltd. & Anr Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 3106 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document
1