Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.27 seconds)Section 5 in The Identification Of Prisoners Act, 1920 [Entire Act]
The State Of Bombay vs Kathi Kalu Oghad And Others on 4 August, 1961
58. The learned Trial Judge has held that in view of the
decision reported as 1961 Cri. LJ 856 State of Bombay Vs.
Kathi Kalu Oghad & Ors. the report Ex.PW-31/G was admissible
in evidence and was properly proved. Decisions cited which
Crl.A.No.537/2006 Page 24 of 42
took the view that unless orders were obtained from the Court
of Competent Jurisdiction followed by a proper identification of
the prisoner as required by Section 5 of the Identification of
Prisoners Act 1920, if the alleged specimen writings and
signatures were obtained in contravention of said procedure of
law, reports based thereon were inadmissible in evidence,
have been held by the learned Trial Judge to be contrary to the
ratio of law laid down in Kathi Kalu Oghad‟s case (supra).