Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.01 seconds)
Mr. Rajnish Yadav Proprietor Of M/S ... vs The North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 10 January, 2023 cites

Mr. Rajnish Yadav vs The North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 6 May, 2020

24. Insofar as the appellant's / plaintiff's claim for refund of the security deposit is concerned, it was admitted that MCD had deducted Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:Dushyant Rawal RFA(OS) (COMM) 1/2021 Page 10 of 12 Signing Date:10.01.2023 2023/DHC/000174 a sum of ₹27,88,530/- from the amounts payable under the RA Bills furnished by the appellant / plaintiff. The amounts retained by MCD are admittedly refundable to the appellant / plaintiff. It was MCD's case that the appellant / plaintiff was required to complete certain formalities including production of certain certificates regarding clearance of labour dues for claiming a refund of the said amount. The learned Single Judge held that since the appellant / plaintiff had not completed the requisite formalities, he was not entitled to a refund of the said amount.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - M Gupta - Full Document
1