Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.60 seconds)

Ashwin Nanubhai Vyas vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 10 October, 1966

5. This case was being heard under Chapter XVIII which divides committal cases into two classes (a) those commenced on a police report and (b) other cases. The first kind is tried under the procedure ::: Downloaded on - 05/12/2025 23:18:06 :::CIS 19 laid down in s. 207A. With that procedure we are not concerned. The other cases are tried under the procedure as laid down in the other provisions of Chapter XVIII. Section 208 of this Chapter .
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 105 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document

Shri Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr vs Shri Venkat @ Babru S/O Wamanrao ... on 5 July, 2006

13. This Court had occasion to consider Sections 256 and 302 in Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr. Vs. Venkat @ Babru, (2006) 5 SCC 530. In the above case complaint was filed under Section 500 read with Section 34 IPC. A petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code 1973 against the order of issue of process in the High Court which was dismissed. SLP was filed in this Court in which notice was issued and during the pendency of the appeal it was noted that complainant had died. It was contended that the complaint be dismissed on the ground that complainant is dead. This Court in the above context referred to Sections 256 and 302. This Court repelled the argument of the appellant that complaint be dismissed on the ground that complainant had died. Following was held in paragraphs 3 to 6:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 33 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next