Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.48 seconds)Section 111 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 80 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
The Customs Act, 1962
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 81 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 79 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Whirlpool Corporation vs Registrar Of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors on 26 October, 1998
The Apex Court has
in Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks;
Mumbai ((1998) 8 SCC 1: AIR 1999 S.C. 22) reiterated the
proposition that the jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain a
writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not
affected in spite of alternative statutory remedies in cases where the
authority against whom the writ is filed is shown to have had no
jurisdiction or had purported to usurp jurisdiction without any legal
foundation. In the view that I have taken it has to be necessarily
held that the order of confiscation passed in the instant case is one
without a legal foundation. I therefore overrule the contention of
the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the
petitioner should be relegated to the alternative statutory remedies
available to him."