Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.27 seconds)Section 34 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Soli Pestonji Majoo & Ors vs Gangadhar Khemka on 6 December, 1968
4. Soli Pestonji Majoo v. Gangadhar Khomka 1969 1 SCC 220.
N.M.Veerappa vs Canara Bank on 27 January, 1998
3. N.M. Veerappa v. Canara Bank 1998 2 SCC 317.
The Companies Act, 1956
State Bank Of India vs Yasangi Venkateswara Rao on 21 January, 1999
9. State Bank of India v. Yasangi Venkateswara Rao (1999) 2 SCC
Section 34 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
Union Bank Of India vs Dalpat Gaurishankar Upadyay on 2 April, 1992
1. Union Bank of India v. Dalpat Gaurishankar Upadyay AIR 1992
Bom 482.
Central Bank Of India vs Ravindra And Ors on 18 October, 2001
13. I find merit in the submissions advanced by Mr. Godbole. The
Supreme Court in Central Bank of India (supra) was considering
whether interest capitalized upon periodical rests assumes the
character of principal. Although the opening portion of the judgment
is in the context of Section 34 of the CPC, the discussion on the
capitalization of interest is founded on first principles and is
provision-neutral. It therefore applies to all provisions where the
expression "principal" is employed, including those contained in
Order XXXIV.