cites: 191468135

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)

Ca No. 14/16 State vs . Vikas @ Vicky 1/12 on 20 August, 2016 cites

Vikas Verma @ Vicky V. State Of Rajasthan vs Vikas Verma @ Vicky V. State Of Rajasthan on 30 March, 2015

Announced in open court (Devender Kumar) today on 16.08.2016 Additional Sessions Judge-03 (NE): Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. CA No. 14/16 State Vs. Vikas @ Vicky 12/12

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 17 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 395484

Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 748445

Section 415 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 5238

Article 114 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 3 - Cited by 331

Hema vs State Tr.Insp.Of Police Madras on 7 January, 2013

Even otherwise, FSL report is not mandatory when crime has been proved by reliable evidence as held in Hema v. State Through Inspector of Police, Madras (2013) 10 SCC 192 that failure to exhibit FSL report was not fatal to the case when crime was proved by reliable evidence.

Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 41 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

The Limitation Act, 1963

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 47361

Section 311 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 18381

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results