Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)Section 18 in Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980
State Of Punjab vs Dewan Chuni Lal on 16 February, 1970
Referring to All India Reporter 1970 Supreme Court page
2086 (The State of Punjab v. Dewan Chuni Lal) it is submitted
that, the person who had allegedly received the illegal gratification of
Rs.1,000/- has not been produced in evidence. This incident is
claimed to have happened by a person whose evidence has no value.
Union Of India & Ors vs Bishamber Das Dogra on 26 May, 2009
In Bishamber Das Dogra (supra), Asim Chatterjee & Ors.
(supra), Debasis Das & Ors. (supra) and Amar Nath Chowdhury
(supra) the Supreme Court has held that non-supply of relevant
documents to a delinquent may be in breach of the principles of
natural justice. However, such breach of the principles of natural
justice does not automatically result in the order of punishment being
set aside or the departmental proceedings being declared null and
void. It is for the delinquent employee to plead and prove that the
non-receipt of the documents by the delinquent has caused him
prejudice and has resulted in miscarriage of justice.
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Alok Kumar Chamaria And Ors. on 11 April, 1997
In support of such contention reliance has been placed on
2010 Volume 5 Supreme Court Cases page 349 (Union of India &
Ors. v. Alok Kumar). Referring to the Circular promoting the original
writ petitioner it is contended on behalf of the writ petitioner that, the
Corporation authorities had condoned the alleged misconduct by
reason of grant of such promotion.
Canara Bank And Ors vs Shri Debasis Das And Ors on 12 March, 2003
In Bishamber Das Dogra (supra), Asim Chatterjee & Ors.
(supra), Debasis Das & Ors. (supra) and Amar Nath Chowdhury
(supra) the Supreme Court has held that non-supply of relevant
documents to a delinquent may be in breach of the principles of
natural justice. However, such breach of the principles of natural
justice does not automatically result in the order of punishment being
set aside or the departmental proceedings being declared null and
void. It is for the delinquent employee to plead and prove that the
non-receipt of the documents by the delinquent has caused him
prejudice and has resulted in miscarriage of justice.
Amar Nath Chowdhury vs Braithwaite And Company Ltd. & Ors on 11 January, 2002
In Bishamber Das Dogra (supra), Asim Chatterjee & Ors.
(supra), Debasis Das & Ors. (supra) and Amar Nath Chowdhury
(supra) the Supreme Court has held that non-supply of relevant
documents to a delinquent may be in breach of the principles of
natural justice. However, such breach of the principles of natural
justice does not automatically result in the order of punishment being
set aside or the departmental proceedings being declared null and
void. It is for the delinquent employee to plead and prove that the
non-receipt of the documents by the delinquent has caused him
prejudice and has resulted in miscarriage of justice.
Burdwan Central Co-Op.Bank Ltd.& Anr vs Asim Chatterjee & Ors on 18 January, 2012
In Bishamber Das Dogra (supra), Asim Chatterjee & Ors.
(supra), Debasis Das & Ors. (supra) and Amar Nath Chowdhury
(supra) the Supreme Court has held that non-supply of relevant
documents to a delinquent may be in breach of the principles of
natural justice. However, such breach of the principles of natural
justice does not automatically result in the order of punishment being
set aside or the departmental proceedings being declared null and
void. It is for the delinquent employee to plead and prove that the
non-receipt of the documents by the delinquent has caused him
prejudice and has resulted in miscarriage of justice.
Bhagirathi Jena vs Board Of Directors, O.S.F.G. And Ors on 31 March, 1999
In support of such
contention reliance has been placed on All India Reporter 1999
Supreme Court page 1841 (Bhagirathi Jena v. Board of
Directors, O.S.F.C & Ors.) and 1993 Volume 1 Calcutta Law
Journal page 371 (Mrinal Kanti Chakraborty v. State of West
Bengal & Ors.).