Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.30 seconds)

Whirlpool Corporation vs Registrar Of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors on 26 October, 1998

Therefore, the High Court should be extremely careful and circumspect in exercising its discretion to grant stay in such matters. Of course, if the petitioner is able to show that its case falls within any of the exceptions carved out in Baburam Prakash Chandra Maheshwari v. Antarim Zila ::: Downloaded on - 04/08/2023 20:35:29 :::CIS 18 Parishad [AIR 1969 SC 556], Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks [(1998) 8 SCC 1] and .
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 1316 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

United Bank Of India vs Satyawati Tondon & Ors on 26 July, 2010

Such loan does not become the property of the person taking the loan, but retains its character of public money given in a fiduciary capacity as of entrustment by the public. Timely repayment also ensures liquidity to facilitate loan to another in need, by circulation of the money and cannot be permitted to be blocked by frivolous litigation by rt those who can afford the luxury of the same. The caution required, as expressed in United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110:
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 3973 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next