cites: 191627

1 - 10 of 28 (0.23 seconds)

Naresh Bhansali vs State Of Rajesthan And Ors. on 21 August, 2000 cites

Smt. Sudama Devi vs Commissioner And Ors. on 14 January, 1983

6. It is settled proposition of law that delay, even of one day, in a particular case may be fatal for the petitioner and may unable the Court to grant any relief even if he has good case on merit. (Vide Smt. Sudama Devi v. Commissioner and Ors. .

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 70 - Full Document

Pannalal Binjraj vs Union Of India on 21 December, 1956

7. Petitioner faced the selection process with his eyes open, knowing well the criteria Laid down in the corrigendum and amended advertisement without raising any protest and merely because at this stage he stood unsuccessful, he cannot be heard. (Vide M/s. Pannalal Binjraj and Ors. v. Union of India ; Manak Lal v. Prem Chand ; Madan Lal and Ors. v. State of J & K and Ors. AIR 1975 SC 1088; Dr. G. Sarana v. University of Lucknow AIR 1976 2428; Maj.

Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 307 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document

Manak Lal vs Dr. Prem Chand on 6 February, 1957

7. Petitioner faced the selection process with his eyes open, knowing well the criteria Laid down in the corrigendum and amended advertisement without raising any protest and merely because at this stage he stood unsuccessful, he cannot be heard. (Vide M/s. Pannalal Binjraj and Ors. v. Union of India ; Manak Lal v. Prem Chand ; Madan Lal and Ors. v. State of J & K and Ors. AIR 1975 SC 1088; Dr. G. Sarana v. University of Lucknow AIR 1976 2428; Maj.

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 255 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

G. Sarana vs University Of Lucknow & Ors on 28 July, 1976

7. Petitioner faced the selection process with his eyes open, knowing well the criteria Laid down in the corrigendum and amended advertisement without raising any protest and merely because at this stage he stood unsuccessful, he cannot be heard. (Vide M/s. Pannalal Binjraj and Ors. v. Union of India ; Manak Lal v. Prem Chand ; Madan Lal and Ors. v. State of J & K and Ors. AIR 1975 SC 1088; Dr. G. Sarana v. University of Lucknow AIR 1976 2428; Maj.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 411 - J Singh - Full Document

Chandra Bhan Singh vs Latafat Ullah Khan & Ors on 19 September, 1978

Chander Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan and Ors. ; Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and Ors. ; Power Control Appliances and Ors. v. Sumeet Machineries Pvt. Ltd. ; State of Punjab v. Krishan Niwas ; State of Orissa v. Narain Parasad ; U.D. Lama v. State of Sikkim , Union of India and Ors. v. N. Chandrasekharan ; Suneeta Agrawal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; and State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anilkumar Sunilkumar & Party .

Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 74 - P N Shinghal - Full Document

Om Prakash Shukla vs Akhilesh Kumar Shukla & Ors on 18 March, 1986

Chander Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan and Ors. ; Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and Ors. ; Power Control Appliances and Ors. v. Sumeet Machineries Pvt. Ltd. ; State of Punjab v. Krishan Niwas ; State of Orissa v. Narain Parasad ; U.D. Lama v. State of Sikkim , Union of India and Ors. v. N. Chandrasekharan ; Suneeta Agrawal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; and State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anilkumar Sunilkumar & Party .

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 652 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Power Control Appliances vs Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd on 8 February, 1994

Chander Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan and Ors. ; Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and Ors. ; Power Control Appliances and Ors. v. Sumeet Machineries Pvt. Ltd. ; State of Punjab v. Krishan Niwas ; State of Orissa v. Narain Parasad ; U.D. Lama v. State of Sikkim , Union of India and Ors. v. N. Chandrasekharan ; Suneeta Agrawal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; and State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anilkumar Sunilkumar & Party .

Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 252 - S Mohan - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Krishan Niwas on 14 March, 1997

Chander Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan and Ors. ; Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and Ors. ; Power Control Appliances and Ors. v. Sumeet Machineries Pvt. Ltd. ; State of Punjab v. Krishan Niwas ; State of Orissa v. Narain Parasad ; U.D. Lama v. State of Sikkim , Union of India and Ors. v. N. Chandrasekharan ; Suneeta Agrawal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; and State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anilkumar Sunilkumar & Party .

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 53 - Full Document

State Of Orissa & Ors vs Narain Prasad & Ors.,Etc.Etc on 3 September, 1996

Chander Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan and Ors. ; Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and Ors. ; Power Control Appliances and Ors. v. Sumeet Machineries Pvt. Ltd. ; State of Punjab v. Krishan Niwas ; State of Orissa v. Narain Parasad ; U.D. Lama v. State of Sikkim , Union of India and Ors. v. N. Chandrasekharan ; Suneeta Agrawal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; and State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anilkumar Sunilkumar & Party .

Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 102 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Mr. U.D. Lama & Ors vs The State Of Sikkim & Ors on 26 November, 1996

Chander Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan and Ors. ; Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and Ors. ; Power Control Appliances and Ors. v. Sumeet Machineries Pvt. Ltd. ; State of Punjab v. Krishan Niwas ; State of Orissa v. Narain Parasad ; U.D. Lama v. State of Sikkim , Union of India and Ors. v. N. Chandrasekharan ; Suneeta Agrawal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; and State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anilkumar Sunilkumar & Party .

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 34 - Full Document

1 2 3 Next