Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (1.94 seconds)

Esther Marie Jackson vs Frederick Ormond Layland Jackson on 22 December, 1911

(19) The dictum of Chaudhary J. that the restitution decree enforces "sexual cohabitation with an unwilling parley" and "constitutes the grossest form. of violation of individual's right to privacy" and "offends the in inevitability of the body and the mind subjected to the decree and offends the integrity of such a person and invades the marital privacy and domestic intimacies of such a person" is the high water mark of his judicial pronouncement. With respect to the learned judge cannot agree that this is what the restitution decree does. The cases referred to by him do not prove his proposition. Jackson v. Jackson 1924.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 14 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next