Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Section 9 in The Petroleum Act, 1934 [Entire Act]
Chairman-Cum-M.D.,Coal India Ld.& Ors vs Ananta Saha & Ors on 6 April, 2011
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner puts further reliance
on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case
of "Chariman-cum-Managing Director, Coal India Limited &
Ors. Vs. Ananta Saha & Ors." reported in (2011) 5 SCC 142,
wherein it has been held that if initial action is not in consonance
with law, subsequent proceeding will not sanctify the same.
Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914
Section 3 in The Petroleum Act, 1934 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Petroleum Act, 1934 [Entire Act]
Murari Singh And Anr. vs The State Of Bihar And Ors. on 22 February, 1978
8. The other ground of attack to the impugned certificate
proceedings is that the notices issued to the petitioners were not
accompanied with proper requisition forms and were not in the
prescribed format. The learned counsel for the petitioners also puts
reliance on judgments of the Patna High Court rendered in the cases
of "Murari Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar" reported in 1978
SCC OnLine Pat 48 and "Lachmi Kant Deo Prasad Singh Vs.
Ramesh Choudhary & Ors." reported in 1946 SCC OnLine Pat
315 and submits that in the aforesaid judgments, it has been held
that if the notice and form are not in the proper format, the entire
certificate proceeding stands vitiated.
Braj Mohan Prasad Singh vs Bihar State Housing Board And Ors. ... on 10 November, 2003
In view of the aforesaid facts, this Court finds that the
amount so demanded from the petitioners is not a predetermined
liability of personal loan alleged to have been taken by the petitioners
under the circumstances detailed hereinabove and thus in view of the
8
judgment of the Patna High Court rendered in the case of "Brij
Mohan Prasad" (supra), the certificate proceedings against the
petitioners cannot be said to have been initiated in accordance with
law.
1