Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)
Swapnil Suresh Mandlik vs The Branch Manager, The New India ... on 30 April, 2019 cites

Mukund Dewangan vs Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd on 11 February, 2016

9. The next contention of the learned counsel for insurer is that in the case at hand, ::: Uploaded on - 30/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 01/05/2019 20:52:34 ::: 8 fa567.19 the ratio of "Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited"[supra], is not applicable, as on the date of accident, the driver of offending vehicle did not hold valid and effective driving license to drive LMV of any category.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 2801 - A Mishra - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004

8. Next contention of the learned counsel for the insurer is that the Opponent No. 2 is the owner as well as driver of the offending vehicle, therefore, he was well aware that on the date of accident, he did not hold valid and effective driving license to drive LMV. Thus, the owner of the offending vehicle has committed 'fundamental breach of policy of the insurance'. So also this appeal being filed by the owner of the offending vehicle and not by the third party claimant, therefore, the ratio of "National Insurance Company Ltd., v. Swaran Singh and Others" [supra] is not applicable in the case at hand.
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 3847 - Full Document

M.S. Bhati vs National Insurance Company Ltd. on 29 March, 2019

He has pointed out that even in "M.S.Bhatt v. National Insurance Company Ltd."[supra] and "Compaq International and another v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited and Another"[supra], the matter before the Supreme Court was against the judgment and order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Reddressal Commission, therefore the ratio of these both cases is distinguishable on facts.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

M/S. Compaq International vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... on 25 January, 2016

He has pointed out that even in "M.S.Bhatt v. National Insurance Company Ltd."[supra] and "Compaq International and another v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited and Another"[supra], the matter before the Supreme Court was against the judgment and order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Reddressal Commission, therefore the ratio of these both cases is distinguishable on facts.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next