Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)

Union Of India And Ors. Etc vs Virpal Singh Chauhan Etc on 10 October, 1995

The Apex Court in the B.K. Pavitra and others vs. Union of India & others, 2017 (2017) 4 SCC 620 case has relied on the judgment in M. Nagraj & Others vs. Union of India & Ors (2006) 8 SCC 212, Union of India vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684 and Ajit Singh Januja and ors.(-II) vs. State of Punjab and Ors, (1999) 7 SCC 209. In the case of Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684; it has been held as under;
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 447 - B P Reddy - Full Document

M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October, 2006

The Apex Court in the B.K. Pavitra and others vs. Union of India & others, 2017 (2017) 4 SCC 620 case has relied on the judgment in M. Nagraj & Others vs. Union of India & Ors (2006) 8 SCC 212, Union of India vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684 and Ajit Singh Januja and ors.(-II) vs. State of Punjab and Ors, (1999) 7 SCC 209. In the case of Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684; it has been held as under;
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 793 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

Jakotia Plastics Private Limited (Unit ... vs Andhra Pradesh State Electricity ... on 5 October, 1999

The Apex Court in the B.K. Pavitra and others vs. Union of India & others, 2017 (2017) 4 SCC 620 case has relied on the judgment in M. Nagraj & Others vs. Union of India & Ors (2006) 8 SCC 212, Union of India vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684 and Ajit Singh Januja and ors.(-II) vs. State of Punjab and Ors, (1999) 7 SCC 209. In the case of Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684; it has been held as under;
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 11 - Cited by 7 - E D Rao - Full Document

Ajit Singh Januja & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 March, 1996

10. From plain perusal of counter affidavit shows that the respondents have applied out-of-turn promotion 8 OA No.2415 of 2017 Court No.6 (item No.26) and the reservation principle for assigning higher seniority to the batch mates juniors to Shri S.S.Singh in the rank of ACIOs-II/Exe. It is not clear whether they have applied catch up rule to rectify the seniority of the General Category candidates in view of judgments in Union of India vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan, (1995) 6 SCC 684; Ajit Singh Januja (Ajit Singh-I) vs. State of Punjab; 1996 SCC (L&S) 540; Ajit Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and Others (Ajit Singh -I) (1997) 7 SCC 209; S. Panneer Selvam & Others. vs. State of Tamilnadu and others, (2015) 10 SCC 10 SCC 292.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 186 - N P Singh - Full Document
1