Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.65 seconds)
Muthukaleeswaran vs The Inspector Of Police on 27 September, 2022 cites

Amrik Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 11 July, 2022

13. Superadded, in Amrik Singh vs. State of Punjab [(2022) 9 Supreme Court Cases 402], the Apex Court has categorically held that when 21/28 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/11/2025 05:34:12 pm ) Crl.A.(MD)No.738 of 2022 no TIP is conducted, the first version of the complainant reflected in the FIR would play an important role and when the identity or description of the accused is not mentioned in the FIR, the identification of the accused for the first time before the Court cannot be believed. This judgment applies very much on all fours to the facts of this case.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 24 - M R Shah - Full Document

Rajesh Govind Jagesha vs State Of Maharashtra on 2 November, 1999

In Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra, [(1999) 8 SCC 428 : 1999 SCC (Cri) 1452] it was laid down that the absence of test identification parade may not be fatal if the accused is sufficiently described in the complaint leaving no doubt in the mind of the court regarding his involvement or is arrested on the spot immediately after the occurrence and in either eventuality, the evidence of witnesses identifying the accused for the first time in court can form the basis for conviction without the same being corroborated by any other evidence and, accordingly, conviction of the accused was upheld by this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 177 - R P Sethi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next