Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.67 seconds)
Vipra Pensioners Association ... vs State Of U.P.Through Prin Secy Housing ... on 20 November, 2010
cites
The Provident Funds Act, 1925
Section 5 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 5 in The Provident Funds Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 5A in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 59 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Secretary, H.S.E.B vs Suresh & Ors Etc. Etc on 30 March, 1999
48.In (1999) 3 Supreme Court Cases 601; Secretary, H.S.E.B. v. Suresh and others, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with labour welfare legislation ruled that beneficent construction of the statutory provision must be given keeping the public interest at large and courts must decide while interpreting the statutory provisions keeping in view the interest of the public inspired by principles of justice, equity and good conscience. (para 14, 17 and 18).
M/S Essen Deinki vs Rajiv Kumar on 29 October, 2002
49.In the case reported in (2002) 8 Supreme Court Cases 400; Essen Deinki Vs. Rajiv Kumar, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that when the question arises with regard to the interpretation of welfare legislation, it is the duty of the courts to give broad interpretation keeping in view the purpose of such legislation of preventing arbitrary action though the statutory requirements cannot be ignored.