Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.38 seconds)Rajnikant Desaibhai Patel And 2 Ors. vs Competent Authority And Additional ... on 28 February, 2007
As
per the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Rules,
1976, (hereinafter referred to as the Rules for short) more
particularly Rule 5(2)(a)(ii), all other persons so far as may be
known, who have, or are likely to have any claim to or interest in,
the ownership, or possession, or both, of the vacant lands, are
required to be served with the draft statement. Therefore, even if
one is not having any interest in the ownership, but one may have
claim in the property or claim in possession is also required to be
served with the draft statement as per the provisions of Rule 5 of
the aforesaid Rules. The reference may be made to the decision of
this Court in the case of Rajnikant Desaibhai Patel vs. Competent
Authority and Additional Collector, Vadodara reported at 2007(4) GLR
3573 and more particularly the observations made at para 10.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Manganbhai C. Patel vs Competent Officer And Deputy ... on 27 December, 2000
This
Court in the case of Mangabhai C. Patel Vs. Competent Officer and
Deputy Collector, Baroda reported at 2007(3) GLR 2731 has taken the
view that the notice under section 10(5) of the Act before taking
over the possession is required to be served upon the occupier.
1