Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.43 seconds)Anil Kumar Neotia And Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 26 April, 1988
26. The learned counsel for the Respondent-Railways in his written
submissions has cited the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated
22.02.2019 in Civil Appeal No.1958/2019 ( SLP © No.32810/2018 ) in
Anil Kumar v. Union of India & Others, in support of his contentions.
However, a careful reading of the above judgment, it is seen that the
Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court only supports the case of the
applicant. The operative portion of the judgment reads as under: "For the
above reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment
and order of the High court dated 3 January 2018. In the facts and
circumstances of the case, in consequence, we direct that the claim of the
appellant for appointment to a Group 'D' post shall be implemented within
12 OA 1467/2017
a period of two months from today by granting age relaxation, if required."
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Krushna Chandra Nayak vs The Railway Board, Represented By Its ... on 14 May, 2014
25. The learned counsel for the Applicants in his written submissions has
cited the Order of the Coordinate Cuttack Bench of this Tribunal dated
13.03.2020 in OA.No.260/709/2014, and submitted that following the
judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Cuttack in W.P.(C) No.5102/2013,
dated 14.05.2014 in Krushna Chandra Nayak v. The Railway Board,
the Cuttack Bench of this Tribunal allowed the OA, wherein also similar
land losers have been benefited by their orders and they have been asked to
be given job by the respondent-Railways.
Butu Prasad Khumbhar & Ors vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd. &Ors on 30 March, 1995
27. The learned counsel for the Respondent-Railways also cited the
judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Patna in LPA.No.1929/2016 in
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25313/2013 dated 03.01l.2018 and Civil
Writ Jurisdiction Case No.774/2018 dated 16.01.2018, and the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Butu Prasad Khumbhar & Others v.
Steel Autority of India Limited &Others (1995 SCC Supl.(2) 225/1995
SCALE (2) 539). On a careful reading of the above judgments of the
Hon'ble High Court of Patna and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we find that
the facts and circumstances in the above cases are different and the same
are not relevant to the facts in the instant case.
Union Of India vs Shankar Prasad Deep Etc.Etc. on 14 March, 2019
12. It is worthwhile to note that in the decision in Civil Appeal
No.3030-3044/2019 in Union of India Vs. Shankar Prasad Deep etc., the
Hon. Supreme Court in the case of land losers went on to observe as
under:-
1